Michigan School Pulls 'Huck Finn' After Parental Complaint
TAYLOR, Mich. — Mark Twain's classic "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" has been pulled from high school classes after a parent of a black student complained that a teacher had students read portions aloud. More...
I'm so annoyed at this crap. Mark Twain is one of the prolific authors of his time. In a lot of ways he is a great historian. Huck Finn has been read in schools for decades. I read it in school, my mother read it in school, heck my grandmother read it. The book, a novel about a young man who befriends a runaway slave near a Mississippi river town, is a great representation of what life was like growing up on the river in the late 1800's.
I'm so sick of affirmative action, political correctness, and claims of discrimination. I mean, we need to be respectful of each other, but history is history and the offense of one or two students should not penalize the entire student body. Its history! Its part of our country's past! It’s just how it was! How can they just take it out? Are they going to stop teaching history now? Forget about the civil war; might as well pretend Lincoln wasn't even president.
Is 'Huck Finn' Racist?Controversial in death as he was in life, Mark Twain has been seriously accused by some of being a "racist writer," whose writing is offensive to black readers, perpetuates cheap slave-era stereotypes, and deserves no place on today's bookshelves.
To those of us who have drunk gratefully of Twain's wisdom and humanity, such accusations are ludicrous. But for some people they clearly touch a raw nerve, and for that reason they deserve a serious answer. Let's look at the book that is most commonly singled out for this criticism, the novel that Ernest Hemingway identified as the source of all American literature: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
For Twain's critics, the novel is racist on the face of it, and for the most obvious reason: many characters use the word "nigger" throughout. But since the action of the book takes place in the south twenty years before the Civil War, it would be amazing if they didn't use that word.
A closer reading also reveals Twain's serious satiric intent. In one scene, for instance, Aunt Sally hears of a steamboat explosion.
"Good gracious! anybody hurt?" she asks.
"No'm," comes the answer. "Killed a nigger."
But anyone who imagines that Mark Twain meant this literally is missing the point. Rather, Twain is using this casual dialogue ironically, as a way to underscore the chilling truth about the old south, that it was a society where perfectly "nice" people didn't consider the death of a black person worth their notice. To drive the point home, Twain has the lady continue:
"Well, it's lucky, because sometimes people do get hurt."
That's a small case in point. But what is the book really about? It's about nothing less than freedom and the quest for freedom. It's about a slave who breaks the law and risks his life to win his freedom and be reunited with his family, and a white boy who becomes his friend and helps him escape.
Because of his upbringing, the boy starts out believing that slavery is part of the natural order; but as the story unfolds he wrestles with his conscience, and when the crucial moment comes he decides he will be damned to the flames of hell rather than betray his black friend. And Jim, as Twain presents him, is hardly a caricature. Rather, he is the moral center of the book, a man of courage and nobility, who risks his freedom -- risks his life -- for the sake of his friend Huck.
Note, too, that it is not just white critics who make this point. Booker T. Washington noted how Twain "succeeded in making his readers feel a genuine respect for 'Jim,'" and pointed out that Twain, in creating Jim's character, had "exhibited his sympathy and interest in the masses of the negro people."
The great black novelist Ralph Ellison, too, noted how Twain allows Jim's "dignity and human capacity" to emerge in the novel.
"Huckleberry Finn knew, as did Mark Twain [Ellison wrote], that Jim was not only a slave but a human being [and] a symbol of humanity . . . and in freeing Jim, Huck makes a bid to free himself of the conventionalized evil taken for civilization by the town" -- in other words, of the abomination of slavery itself.
In fact, you can search through all of Twain's writings, not just the thirty-plus volumes of novels, stories, essays, and letters, but also his private correspondence, his posthumous autobiography and his intimate journals, and you'll be hard put to find a derogatory remark about the black race -- and this at a time when crude racial stereotypes were the basic coin of popular fiction, stage comedy, and popular songs.
What you find in Twain is the opposite: a lively affection and admiration for black Americans that began when he was still a boy and grew steadily through the years. In a widely praised post-Civil War sketch titled "A True Story," for example, he wrenchingly evoked the pain of an ex-slave as she recalls being separated from her young son on the auction block, and her joy at discovering him in a black regiment at war's end.
And on those occasions when Twain does venture to compare blacks and whites, the comparison is not conspicuously flattering to the whites. Things like:
* "One of my theories is that the hearts of men are about alike, all over the world, whatever their skin-complexions may be."
* "Nearly all black and brown skins are beautiful, but a beautiful white skin is rare."
* "There are many humorous things in the world; among them is the white man's notion that he is less savage than all the other savages."
Mark Twain a "racist"! Isn't it about time we put this ridiculous notion to rest?
-- Peter Salwen


4 Comments:
The only people that can be racist now are the "minorities" and they seem to be able to slam us white folk any time they want and we can't even play the race card. How exactly does that work? If some people would use their brain for something constructive, they would realize that history is a good thing, otherwise all kids know about black (or other ethnic) people is what they see in the popular culture. For instance, Jews don't get upset over a movie like "Schindler's List". They (being intelligent, hard-working individuals who have made their way in the world without the constant handouts that others embrace as their right or due) realize that it is a tribute to how they and their ancestors lived, died and ultimately triumphed over an incredible evil.
So to all you whiney, bleeding-heart, so-called minorities --- GET OVER IT! Everyone has ancestors who were persecuted for one reason or another.
To the "African-Americans" -- your own people sold you to the white man; Whitey didn't go searching for you specifically to repress. Take advantage of the opportunity to get an education, work hard and do a good job, support your family and quit complaining about a man who did more to help present you in a positive light to people to whom you had less value than a dog.
Hallelujah! Where's the Tylenol?!
I appreciate your zeal and I agree with the theme of your comments, but I would like to point out that there are an equal amount of caucasion Americans that seem to think that society owes them something. There is enough prosperity in this country to go around at least for now. I mean before our leaders move all their production out of the county.
That may be true, but I have yet to hear in the national news a redneck, trailer trash, white person spout off about how repressed we were by the British and how they need to be given special rights and compensations from the English. Have you? And how often do you hear Christians trying to get compensation from the Catholics for the years of tortue they endured? It's all about whether or not you are willing to accept that sometimes life doesn't give you a fair shake - so what? Who ever said life was fair? As I said before "GET OVER IT!" You have the ability in this still-great (for a while) nation of ours to accomplish anything you have the desire and drive to accomplish PROVIDED you are willing to work hard at it.
Let me also say, lest I seem to be racist, that I don't consider the color of a person's skin to be an indicator of who they are. Likewise, I don't feel anyone should get a job simply because of their nationality, color or gender. If you do the job well, you get the job. If you want to keep your job, do the job well.
Ok - it's someone else's turn now.
Post a Comment
<< Home